AI Model Register Template

Last updated: 2026-08-14

An AI model register is a single table listing every AI system an organisation runs, with one named owner per system, updated at every approval gate. The minimum fields that survive an audit are a stable system identifier, named business and technical owners, a purpose statement, a consequence tier, the model and version, data sources with lawful basis, the human role, a stopping condition, who is authorised to stop it, approval and review dates, and incidents to date.

An institution that cannot list its AI systems cannot govern them. The register is the base record that every other governance activity refers to: tiering, approval, review, and incident response all read from it and write back to it.

The template

One table, one owner, updated at every gate. Fields below are the minimum that survives an audit.

FieldPurpose
System IDStable identifier used across all other systems
Business ownerNamed individual who accepts the output, not a team
Technical ownerNamed individual accountable for operation
Purpose statementOne sentence on the decision this system informs or makes
Consequence tier1 to 4, assigned by the tiering criteria below
Build or buyInternal, vendor, or vendor component embedded in a wider product
Model and versionIncluding vendor model identifiers where applicable
Data sourcesSystems of origin, plus lawful basis where personal data applies
Human roleDecides, reviews, or is informed
Stopping conditionObservable trigger for withdrawal
Authorised to stopNamed individual and their delegate
Approval date and approver
Next review dateMandatory field, no null values permitted
Incidents to dateCount and link to records

How to use it

  • Create one table with one owner. Distributed registers held per department stop reconciling within a quarter.
  • Populate business owner and technical owner with named individuals, never a team or a role. Accountability that is not attached to a person is not accountability.
  • Update the register at every gate rather than on a review cycle, so the record and reality do not diverge between reviews.
  • Treat next review date as mandatory with no null values permitted. A null there is how systems quietly leave supervision.

This template comes from the AI Governance: A Practical Playbook, which sets out the reasoning behind it, the rules of thumb that govern its use, and the signals that tell you the approach is failing. The full playbook is also available as Markdown. See all AI governance templates.