AI Model Register Template
Last updated: 2026-08-14
An AI model register is a single table listing every AI system an organisation runs, with one named owner per system, updated at every approval gate. The minimum fields that survive an audit are a stable system identifier, named business and technical owners, a purpose statement, a consequence tier, the model and version, data sources with lawful basis, the human role, a stopping condition, who is authorised to stop it, approval and review dates, and incidents to date.
An institution that cannot list its AI systems cannot govern them. The register is the base record that every other governance activity refers to: tiering, approval, review, and incident response all read from it and write back to it.
The template
One table, one owner, updated at every gate. Fields below are the minimum that survives an audit.
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
| System ID | Stable identifier used across all other systems |
| Business owner | Named individual who accepts the output, not a team |
| Technical owner | Named individual accountable for operation |
| Purpose statement | One sentence on the decision this system informs or makes |
| Consequence tier | 1 to 4, assigned by the tiering criteria below |
| Build or buy | Internal, vendor, or vendor component embedded in a wider product |
| Model and version | Including vendor model identifiers where applicable |
| Data sources | Systems of origin, plus lawful basis where personal data applies |
| Human role | Decides, reviews, or is informed |
| Stopping condition | Observable trigger for withdrawal |
| Authorised to stop | Named individual and their delegate |
| Approval date and approver | |
| Next review date | Mandatory field, no null values permitted |
| Incidents to date | Count and link to records |
How to use it
- Create one table with one owner. Distributed registers held per department stop reconciling within a quarter.
- Populate business owner and technical owner with named individuals, never a team or a role. Accountability that is not attached to a person is not accountability.
- Update the register at every gate rather than on a review cycle, so the record and reality do not diverge between reviews.
- Treat next review date as mandatory with no null values permitted. A null there is how systems quietly leave supervision.
This template comes from the AI Governance: A Practical Playbook, which sets out the reasoning behind it, the rules of thumb that govern its use, and the signals that tell you the approach is failing. The full playbook is also available as Markdown. See all AI governance templates.